Category Archives: Health care

Kinde, Küche und Kirche, Teil Zwei

In the late 1890s, a travel writer by the name of Marie Remick, in a book called A Woman’s Travel-Notes on England, made the following observation:

After Germany, where women apparently take no interest in public affairs, and seem to obey to the letter the young emperor’s injunction “Let women devote themselves to the three K’s, — die Küche, die Kirche, die Kinder“(kitchen, church, and children), the active interest and influence of English women on all great questions were refreshing.

Liberal writers used the triple K phrase numerous times throughout the 1890s and it became fairly well-known in the English-speaking world. The Nazis never used the term officially, but by deed they demonstrated that it still held sway in the Reich. For example:

Adolf Hitler in Yugoslavia.

Adolf Hitler in Yugoslavia. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

When Hitler came to power in 1933, he introduced a Law for the Encouragement of Marriage, which entitled newly married couples to a loan of 1000 marks (around 9 months’ average wages at that time). On their first child, they could keep 250 marks. On their second, they could keep another 250. They reclaimed all of the loan by their fourth child. –Wikipedia

The phrase is reminiscent of the American concept that women should be kept ‘barefoot and pregnant’, and suggests that the speaker/writer believes women should be minimalized into birthing machines.

Republican Party (United States)

Republican Party (United States) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The German phrase indicates a woman’s place is with children, the church, and the kitchen, and nothing more. Clearly, a woman is not expected to have a career and a life of her own, and if she did work she should not expect to make as much as a man for the same labor. (Republicans do not support the Lily Ledbetter Act, giving women equal pay for equal work.) Is that not the same philosophy that drives the Republican right to pass 31 bills restricting or outlawing abortion but not one bill on job creation to date? The conservatives seem obsessed with controlling women’s bodies, passing laws requiring women to have transvaginal probes inserted in their bodies so that they may confront the fetus they plan to abort face to face, as it were. (Virginia) And are they not possessed by the fear that their Christian churches might be damaged by some federal law? (They don’t care a fig about synagogues and mosques, because they have convinced themselves that Christianity is the only correct religion.) And what argument do they make against same-sex marriage? That gay people can’t have children. So they are fixated on children, too. (They’re really off on this argument, given how far science has come.)

Of course, they are frightened. Their way of life is changing, the nation is moving from white domination to a mixed bag, and they fear that. So they want to keep those white Christian children coming. And they seem to want the mom to stay home, out of the workforce, and take care of the kids. How different is that from Kinder, Küche, und Kirche?

Enhanced by Zemanta

1 Comment

Filed under Conservatism, Conservatives, Gay rights, Hatred, Health care, Human rights, Misanthropy, Politics, Religion, Republicans, Rights, Sexuality, Status, Women, Women's rights

The Right to End It All

Suicide has always been a hot button issue in western societies. It’s existence has led to absurd situations, as legal systems demonstrated their repugnance for the act by putting to death those poor souls who tried it and failed! But plain suicide has been relegated to the shadows by the idea of assisted suicide. The thought that some one could help another commit suicide drives many other people crazy. They fulminate and pontificate that no one has the right to take a life but God. It doesn’t seem to matter to them what dire straits the suicidee may be in. Only God can set you free. That, I believe, is fascinating, considering that many of these same people favor the death penalty for criminals. So is there a difference between helping someone die with dignity and putting someone to death against their will? Apparently.

English: "An Evening with Dr. Jack Kevork...

English: “An Evening with Dr. Jack Kevorkian” hosted by the UCLA Armenian Students’ Association and the Armenian American Medical Society of California. UCLA Royce Hall Auditorium (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

We had a character in American life named Jack Kevorkian , a physician who made the momentous decision to help terminally ill people end their lives. Of course he was vilified for violating his Hippocratic oath, but it didn’t both him. He had developed a device that allowed a patient to self-administer the drugs that would end life, and his role was to attach it to the patient. But it was the person who pushed the button to do the deed. For this work, the State of Michigan revoked his medical license in 1991, but he persevered, and according to his lawyer, Geoffrey Figer, he assisted in 130 suicides of terminally ill people. For this work he was eventually tried, convicted, and sent to prison.

Most Americans are afraid to talk about death. But Jack Kevorkian wasn’t. He pushed the envelope. One day, a more enlighten world may come to the same realization that he did, that quantity of life without quality of life is not valuable and people should have the right to say, “Enough. I’m done.”

English: A chart of the most common methods of...

English: A chart of the most common methods of suicide in the USA (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

For an example of the craziness of the law in this area, check out this video: http://cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/world/2012/07/05/elbagir-uk-locked-in-syndrome.cnn.html

Enhanced by Zemanta

1 Comment

Filed under Health care, Human rights